Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38657 (HP)

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD v. THE HP TAX TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS

CR/187/2024 · 2025-11-27

Romesh Verma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No.188 of 2024 a/w Civil Revision Nos.187, 189 & 190 of 2024. Date of Decision: 27.11.2025 1. Civil Revision No.188 of 2024 _____________________________________________________ M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd ...Petitioner… Versus HP Tax Tribunal and others …..Respondents... 2. Civil Revision No.187 of 2024 _____________________________________________________ M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd ...Petitioner. Versus HP Tax Tribunal and others …..Respondents. 3. Civil Revision No.189 of 2024 ____________________________________________________ M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd ...Petitioner. Versus HP Tax Tribunal and others …..Respondents. 4. Civil Revision No.190 of 2024 _____________________________________________________ M/S Bharti Airtel Ltd ...Petitioner. Versus HP Tax Tribunal & others …..Respondents. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Senior Advocate, through Video conference and Mr. Goverdhan Lal Sharma, Advocate, in all the petitions. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional Advocate General, in all the petitions. _________________________________________________________ Vivek Singh Thakur , Judge (oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that he has instructions to seek permission to withdraw the present petition(s) for applying/availing the benefit of Himachal Pradesh Sadhbhawana Legacy Cases Resolution Scheme, 2025, Phase II, introduced vide notification dated 20.8.2025 with liberty to approach this Court again for redressal of the grievances, if settlement with the respondents fails. 2. No objection has been communicated for allowing the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner(s). 3. Accordingly, the instant petitions are permitted to be withdrawn with liberty, as prayed supra. 4. These petitions stand disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Romesh Verma) Judge November 27, 2025 (Nisha)