Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40601] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9135/2025
1. Rohit S/o Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Bilopa, Police Station Chauth Ka Barawara, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur).
2. Vikas @ Vikka S/o Dayaram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bilopa, Police Station Chauth Ka Barawara, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 07/10/2025
1. The petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.231/2025 registered at Police Station Mantown District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Sections 61(2)(a), 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111(2)b BNS and Section 66-C, 66-D Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 and Section 13 R.P.G.O.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the petitioners is of online
[2025:RJ-JP:40601] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9135/2025] gambling. He argued that no criminal antecedents exists against the petitioners. He again submits that the petitioners are behind the bars since 03.07.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Rohit S/o Kanhaiya Lal and Vikas @ Vikka S/o Dayaram be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR), bmg/40