APHC010744002015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28174 Between: Relli Sanskema Seva Sangam The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GOVIND REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28174 OF 2015 Relli Sanskema Seva Sangam AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 28174 OF 2015 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not calling for tenders for supply of Sanitary Maistries for supervising the sanitation work in Municipal Corporation of Guntur as was done earlier and orally engaging the respondents 5 to 18 on nomination basis in a clandestinely and discreetly from 01.06.2015 for a period of one year as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct respondents 2 to 4 to forthwith call for tenders for supply of Sanitary Maistries for supervising the sanitation work in Municipal Corporation of Guntur as was done earlier and allot the work to the lowest tenderer consistent with Article 14 of the Constitution of India and pass such other orders....” 2. As the issue pertains to the year of 2015. In view of passage of time and changed circumstances, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 21.03.2025 KK