Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38650 (RAJ)

BALLU @ BALISINGH S/O BHANWARSINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12350/2025 · 2025-10-14

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12350/2025 Ballu @ Balisingh S/o Bhanwarsingh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Ammbarpur Police Station Rajakhera District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Judicial Custody At District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Sahu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-Addl.GA. cum PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 14/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 26/2024 registered at Police Station Raja Khera, District Dholpur wherein he has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 336, 504 and 506 of IPC (later on, he has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 504 and 506 of IPC). 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that instant case is a case of no injury and the injured has not sustained any firearm injury while the allegation against the petitioner is that of using a firearm. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is habitual offender (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12350/2025] against whom 12 cases are pending, hence the petitioner is not entitled to get indulgence of bail and the present bail application is liable to be rejected. 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the injured has not sustained any firearm injury in the instant case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Ballu @ Balisingh S/o Bhanwarsingh arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. In case, the petitioner is found involved in committing and repeating the same offence again in future, the Learned Public Prosecutor and State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail before the Jurisdictional Court. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/134