1 2025:CGHC:2937 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4907 of 2024 1 - Manju D/o Shubhram Aged About 24 Years R/o Village And Post - Harethikala, Tahsil - Hasaud, District : Sakti, Chhattisgarh Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha Mandal ( Cgvyapam ) Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector - 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Exam Controller, Chhattisgarh Vyavasayik Pariksha Mandal, Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector - 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suraj Patel, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Avinash Singh, Advocate on behalf of Dr. Sourabh Pande, (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 16/01/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a directions towards the respondent authority to correct the date of birth of the petitioner as 01/06/1999 instead of 01/06/1996 in the TET application form and in the TET result on the basis of 10th class mark-sheet. RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.01.17 18:44:43 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) in the year 2024 was conducted by the respondent and the petitioner submitted the OnLine form for the same. The Mark- sheet was also issued in which the petitioner was found successfully eligible. He submits that while filling of OnLine form inadvertently her date of birth has wrongly been filled as 1-6-1996 instead of 1-6-1999. He submits that the mistake was bona fide and unintentional. This petition has been filed without any delay and as soon as the petitioner realized her mistake has approached this Court and also made representation to the respondent. He further submits that if the correction is not made, it would cause prejudice to the petitioner as her date of birth has been wrongly reflected in the TET mark-sheet and by making a correction in the mark-sheet, is not going to cause any loss or prejudice to the respondent and it will not make any change in the result of the petitioner. Therefore, the relief as claimed may be granted. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that if the petitioner move a fresh representation seeking necessary correction as stated in the writ petition, the same shall be considered in accordance with law within 50 days. 4. In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authority that, if any representation along with the documentary proof in support of her claim is filed by the petitioner for correction of the date of birth in 3 the TET application form and its mark-sheet, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of 50 days in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul