[2025:RJ-JP:48950] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13889/2025 Deepak Shah S/o Laal Babu, Aged About 36 Years, R/o House No. 37, Near Government Veterinary Hospital, Ward No. 13, Ganganagar, Police Station Purani Abadi, District Ganganagar, Presently Residing At Plot No. 225, Gali No. 7, Moti Nagar, Qwees Road, Jhotwara, Rajasthan. (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Sub Jail Sambharlake). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 02/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 233/2025 registered at Police Station Jobner District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family aged 36 years; and is in custody ever since 20.09.2025. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. Learned counsel has submitted that complaints are filed by police authorities not by any private party or individual complainant. Further, learned counsel has submitted that the [2025:RJ-JP:48950] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13889/2025] conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that there are 27 complaints were registered on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal against the accused-applicant, which are from the different States of India. It is further submitted that an amount of Rs. 1.91 crores is reflected in the bank account of the accused. Further, it is contended that it is wrong to say that accused is not having any criminal antecedents rather he is part of organized crime. For the sake of convenience, the list of complaints registered against the accused-applicants on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal is reproduced herein-below:- "1-21401250000871 Cyber Police Station Kashmir SP PC CYBER SRINAGAR JAMMU KASHMIR 2-21601250002127 BANGALORE CITY, KARNATAKA 3-21601250005129 VARTHUR BANGALORE CITY, KARNATAKA 4-21901250004042 Chinchwad Pimpri Chinchwad Police Commissionerate, MAHARASHTRA 5- 21901250008236 HINJEWADI Pimpri Chinchwad Police Commissionerate, MAHARASHTRA 6-23402250001886 SONARI JAMSHEDPUR JHARKHAND 7-30501250002844 PHULWARI PATNA BIHAR 8-30501250002845 PHULWARI PATNA BIHAR 9- 31501250000102 SASTHANCOTTAH KOLLAM RURAL KERALA, 10-31501250000581 PATHANA PURAM, KOLLAM RURAL KERALA 11- 31601250002413 Bellundur PS BANGALORE CITY KARNATAKA 12-31601250002469 Beguru PS BANGALORE CITY KARNATAΚΑ 13-31601250003101 Central CEN Crime PS BANGALORE CITY KARNATAKA 14-31601250011480 VARTHUR BANGALORE CITY KARNATAKA [2025:RJ-JP:48950] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13889/2025] 15- 31602250013764 Belagavi District CEN PS BELAGAVI KARNATAKA 16-31602250019316 KURADU Ballari KARNATAKA 17-31604250041712 SOUTHEAST CEN CRIME PS BANGALORE CITY KARNATAKA 18-31901250001917 SANGAVI Pimpri Chinchwad Police Commissionerate MAHARASHTRA 19-31901250003975 RABALE NAVI MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA 20- 31902250024593 CYBER POLICE STATION WEST REGION BRIHAN MUMBAI CITY MAHARASHTRA 21-31906250101177 PUNE CITY MAHARASHTRA 22-32901250001226 THIRUMURUGAN POONDI TIRUPPUR CITY TAMIL NADU 23- 32902250008638 ANAICUT VELLORE TAMIL NADU 24- 33501250000127 PATEL NAGAR DEHRADUN UTTARAKHAND 25-33701250001072 Cyber Crime PS Rachakonda TELANGANA 26-33701250002243 Bollarum, HYDERABAD CITY TELANGANA 27-33701250002901 Cyberabad Telangana 180000/-" 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there are 27 complaints were registered on National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal against the accused-applicant; that transaction of huge amount is done in the accused-applicants’ bank account and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /96