Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38648 (KAR)

AURELIUS CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR. JINTO JOSE

CRP/34/2019 · 2025-11-25

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48849 CRP No. 34 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 34 OF 2019 (SC) BETWEEN: AURELIUS CORPORATE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, A-125, SECTOR-63, NOIDA - 201 307, UTTAR PRADESH, INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI. TEJ KISHEN PEER. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DHIRENDRA N. KATTI, ADVOCATE) AND: MR. JINTO JOSE S/O P.C. JOSE AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS RESIDING AT B-220, ALPINE PARKS BEGUR MAIN ROAD, BOMMNAHALLI BANGALORE - 560 068. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MUBARAK BEGUM S, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES ACT.1964 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 07.07.2018 PASSED IN SC.NO.1841/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE XX ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XVIII Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48849 CRP No. 34 of 2019 ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE BENGALURU DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Sri Dhirendra N. Katti, learned counsel for the petitioner, permitted to retire from the case. The court notice issued to the petitioner returned with an endorsement 'left the address'; as such, there is no other option for this Court except to dismiss the revision petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6