Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38641 (RAJ)

RAMESHWAR PRASAD SAINI SON OF LATE SHRI BHAGWAN SAHAY SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7956/2024 · 2025-10-14

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41990] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7956/2024 Rameshwar Prasad Saini Son Of Late Shri Bhagwan Sahay Saini, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Village Nayan, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ...Respondent 2. Ved Prakash Saini Son Of Late Shri Mohan Lal Saini, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Nayan, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gordhan Singh Fauzdar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Sudhir Jain with Mr. Parth Sharma and Mr. Hansraj Kuldeep HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 14/10/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted compromise deed dated nil attested by the notary public on 14.10.2025 which is taken on record. This criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 528 Bharatiya Nyay Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for quashing the FIR No.0124 dated 16.06.2024 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant (for short, ‘complainant’) against the petitioner at Police Station Amarsar, District Jaipur Rural for the offence under Sections 143, 427, 447, 504 and 506 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:41990] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7956/2024] Learned counsel for the petitioner, inviting attention of this Court towards the compromise deed dated nil, would submit that the private dispute of civil nature, the genesis of the subject FIR, has amicably been settled between the parties. He, therefore, prays that the criminal misc. petition be allowed and the subject FIR be quashed and set aside. The respondent no.2/complainant-Shri Ved Prakash Saini, present in person and identified by his learned counsel, acknowledging the contents of the compromise deed dated nil notarised on 14.10.2025, submits that he has no objection if the criminal misc. petition is allowed and the subject FIR is quashed. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced at bar, the dispute being private and of civil nature, the compromise deed dated nil, statement of the complainant and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Others: (2012) 10 SCC 303, this Court deems it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The FIR No.0124/2024 dated 16.06.2024 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant at Police Station Amarsar, District Jaipur Rural is quashed and set aside. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /139