Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010023732025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1237 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-66 [3483] Sri Raja Rao Mekala ...Petitioner Vs. Union Of India and Others ...Respondent(s)
********** Advocate for Petitioner: Mohammed Gayasuddin Advocate for Respondent: -
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 24th January 2025 P C: Considering the fact that the petitioner has an equally efficacious alternate remedy under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, by filing an application under Section 17 of the Act and in view of the ratio of the judgment in PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank1, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
2. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No order as to costs.
1 2024 SCC Online SC 528
2 HCJ & RC, J W.P. No: 1237 of 2025
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
akn
3 HCJ & RC, J W.P. No: 1237 of 2025
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Writ Petition No: 1237 of 2025 DATE : 24.01.2025
AKN
59