Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38637 (AP)

Thanjavuru Surendra v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/2674/2018 · 2025-07-10

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010741762018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2674/2018 Between: THANJAVURU SURENDRA, OCC. GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O. Q.NO.932, PHASE-II, SRIHARIKOTA, SHAR PROJECT, PHASE-II, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD. 2. THANJAVURU MADHURI VANTA MADHURI, OCC. TEACHER, R/O. C/O. VANTA SURENDRA, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, NALLAPADU VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THANJAVURU SUNEELA, REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER I.E., THANJAVURU MADHURI(2FLD RESPONDENT HEREIN) R/O. C/O. VANTA SURENDRA, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, NALLAPADU VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case to this Honorable Court against tie order dated. 12.08.2018 passed in CrI.MP.No.132/2018 in FCOP.No.426/2017 on the file of the Family Court cum XII Additional District Court, Guntur District, for the following among other IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order dated. 12.08.2018 passed in Crl.MP.No.132/2018 in FCOP.No.426/2017 on the file of the Family Court cum XII Additional District Court, Guntur District, pending disposal of Crl.RC and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: N SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K NAGA PHANINDRA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter was settled out of the Court. Hence, the case has become infructuous. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 11.07.2025 KAS