MERU SIMHACHALAM, EG DISTRICT & 4 OTHERS v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EG DISTRICT & 2 OTHERS
WP/4987/2014 · 2025-08-13
R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38636 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38636 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010740422014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4987/2014 Between:
1. MERU SIMHACHALAM, EG DISTRICT & 4 OTHERS, W/O M.PRASAD AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. OCC: LABOUR R/O. DIVILI VILLAGE PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KANDUKURI ARUNA, W/O APANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC:
FARM LABOUR R/O. DIVILI VILLAGE PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SAVARPU NAGAMANI, W/O SATTIBABU AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: FARM LABOUR, R/O. DIVILI VILLAGE PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. SAVA SATTIBABU, S/O MUNALAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC:
FARM LABOUR R/O. DIVILI VILLAGE PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. GANTA SURYAKANTHAM, W/O LAKSHMIPATHI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: FARM LABOUR R/O. DIVILI VILLAGE PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR EG DISTRICT 2 OTHERS, -
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PEDDAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI
2
DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring action of the respondents in not allotting the land in Survey No. 7 admeasuring Ac. 1.78 guntas situated in Divili Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District to the Petitioners as unreasonable unjust, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to allot same land as house site pattas to the petitioners by considering the representation dated 10-06-2013 and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 6187 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the epresentation dated 10-06-2013 of the Petitioners pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass.
IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 9944 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased implead the petiiotners herien as respondents 4 to 12 in WP No. 4987 of 2014 and miscellaneous petition IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the petitioner as respondent No.4 to 11 in W.P.No.4987 of 2014 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K V RAJASREE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. K UDAYA SRI
3
The Court made the following Order:
There is no appearance for the petitioners despite the matter have been posted for dismissal today. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
BSM
4
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Writ Petition No.4987 of 2014
14-08-2025
BSM