[2025:RJ-JP:39172] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14734/2025 Sriram S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Village Khatkad, Tehsil Gudhagodji Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 3. Tehsildar, Gudhagodji, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14732/2025 Suresh S/o Sanwalram, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Khatkad, Tehsil Gudhagodji Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 3. Tehsildar, Gudhagodji, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14733/2025 Sundaram S/o Prahlad, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Khatkad, Tehsil Gudhagodji, Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 3. Tehsildar, Gudhagodji, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14747/2025 Surendra S/o Amilal Yadav, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village Khatkad, Tehsil Gudhagodji Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, [2025:RJ-JP:39172] (2 of 3) [CW-14734/2025] Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 3. Tehsildar, Gudhagodji, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14748/2025 Dharampal S/o Garibaram, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Village Khatkad, Tehsil Gudhagodji Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 3. Tehsildar, Gudhagodji, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14790/2025 Bahadur S/o Prabhatram, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Village Khatkad, Tehsil Gudhagodji, Dist. Jhunjhunu (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). 3. Tehsildar, Gudhagodji, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 23/09/2025 1. In the present bunch of petitions, petitioners have challenged the notice dated 08.09.2025, whereby the respondent directed to remove/demolish the house of the petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:39172] (3 of 3) [CW-14734/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, respondent have directed to remove/demolish the petitioner's house. It is submitted that the petitioners were having electricity connections and are living on the property in question from a long period. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent Mr. V.D. Gathala has submitted that the actions are carried out in light of the NGT letter dated 22.09.2025 issued by Tehsildar, Gudhagodji, District Jhunjhunu. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it proper to dispose of the present bunch of petitions with a direction that the petitioners and alike persons can mark their presence on 28.10.2025 at 11:00 am before the Tehsildar who has issued notice under Section 91 of Rajasthan Land Revenue Act. Tehsildar is directed to pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, after considering the facts. Till passing of orders by the concerned Tehsildar, status quo, as on date, be maintained qua the petitioners. 5. In light of the above, these petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /131-136