2025:HHC:44566 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CMPMO No. 9 of 2020 Decided on: 19.12.2025 ____________________________________________________ Sukhdev and others ……….. petitioners Versus Ranjeet Singh and others ……….respondents ____________________________________________________ Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners : Mr. J.R. Poswal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. : Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 2, 8 and 15 to 17. : Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate, for respondents No.6 & 7. : Respondents No. 3 to 5, 11, 13 and 18 proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 27.02.2020. ____________________________________________________ Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) Respondent No. 12(a), though served, but none has put in appearance on his behalf. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that since the suit wherefrom the present proceedings arise stands withdrawn, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition. The relevant 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 order of the National Lok Adalat in this respect is placed on record. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 19th December, 2025 tarun