Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38635 (DEL)

SANJAY GUPTA v. UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR.

W.P.(C)/2619/2023 · 2025-04-15

Vikas Mahajan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~6 - 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2619/2023 & CM APPL. 10134/2023 SANJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Mr. Ayush Choudhary, Mr. Sarthak Pathak and Mr.Devanshu Yadav, Advs. versus UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samarendra Kumar, Mr. Sandeep Soni, Mr. Vishnu Jaisval, Mr. Adarsh Raj Singh, Ms. Priyanka Singh and Mr. Sumit Chanchal, Advs. for Bank 7. + W.P.(C) 2621/2023 & CM APPL. 10139/2023 SANJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Mr. Ayush Choudhary, Mr. Sarthak Pathak and Mr.Devanshu Yadav, Advs. versus UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samarendra Kumar, Mr. Sandeep Soni, Mr. Vishnu Jaisval, Mr. Adarsh Raj Singh, Ms. Priyanka Singh and Mr. Sumit Chanchal, Advs. for Bank 8. + W.P.(C) 2624/2023 & CM APPL. 10144/2023 SANJAY GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gautam Awasthi, Mr. Ayush This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:10:15 Choudhary, Mr. Sarthak Pathak and Mr.Devanshu Yadav, Advs. versus UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Samarendra Kumar, Mr. Sandeep Soni, Mr. Vishnu Jaisval, Mr. Adarsh Raj Singh, Ms. Priyanka Singh and Mr. Sumit Chanchal, Advs. for Bank Ms. Gunjan Rathore, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, Adv. for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R % 15.04.2025 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to approach the learned DRT by way of an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. 2. He submits that the benefit of the period spent before this Court may also be granted to the petitioner for seeking condonation of delay. 3. In view of the above, the writ petitions alongwith pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. In the event the petitioner files an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 the learned DRT may consider the prayer for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal in accordance with law having regard to the fact that the petitioners were prosecuting the present writ petitions before this Court. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:10:15 5. Needless to say that it shall be open to the respondent/bank to raise objection as to the limitation. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J APRIL 15, 2025 N.S.ASWAL This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:10:15