Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38633 (JHR)

SHYAM BABU ARYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

C.M.P./1197/2025 · 2025-12-19

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:38184 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.1197 of 2025 ----- Shyam Babu Arya, S/O- Kashi Nath Arya, Aged about 78 years, R/O- Quarter No.634, Sector-3/E, Bokaro Steel City, P.O & P.S- Bokaro, District- Bokaro. … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, having office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O- Dhurwa, P.S- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 2. The Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Co-Operative, having office at Nepal House, P.O & P.S- Doranda, District- Ranchi. 3. The Registrar, Jharkhand Co-operative Society, Dhurwa Goal Chakkar, P.O- Dhurwa, P.S-Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro having office at Camp-2 Bokaro, P.O & P.S- Bokaro Steel City, District- Bokaro. 5. The District Co-operative Officer, Bokaro having office at Camp 1 Bokaro, P.O & P.S- Bokaro Steel City, District- Bokaro. 6. The Sub- Registrar, Bokaro, having office at Chas, P.O & P. S- Chas, District- Bokaro. 7. The Secretary, Professor Bari- Co-operative, Girih Nirman Samite Limited, having office at Sahyog Nagar, P.O- Tetuliya, P.S-Pindrajora, District-Bokaro. … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. K. Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Divyam, AC to SC-IV …...... 02 /19.12.2025: This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 6693 of 2022 to its original file, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 29.01.2024, for removing the defects. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that he will remove the surviving defects in W.P.(C) No. 6693 of 2022 by 22.01.2026 if it is restored to its original file. 3. Learned counsel representing the opposite parties does not oppose the aforesaid submission. 4. Considering the submission of learned counsel representing the petitioner, this Civil Misc. Petition stands disposed of. 2025:JHHC:38184 2 5. Office is directed to allow the petitioner to remove the defects in W.P.(C) No. 6693 of 2022 by 22.01.2026. 6. W.P.(C) No. 6693 of 2022 is restored to its original file with a condition that if the defects are not removed by 22.01.2026, this order will not be given effect to. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 19.12.2025 Tanuj/