Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38625 (CAL)

PULAK KUMAR PRAMANIK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/20250/2025 · 2025-09-02

Kausik Chanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

86 02-09-2025 AKG Ct. 15 WPA 20250 of 2025 Shri. Pulak Kumar Pramanik Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Bhaskar Nandi …for the Petitioner Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, Mr. Jaladhi Das …for the State Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s prayer for a revised timetable is scheduled to be heard tomorrow by the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Paschim Medinipur. Needless to mention, the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Paschim Medinipur, shall communicate the reasoned decision to the petitioner upon conclusion of the hearing. In view of the above, there is no necessity to keep this writ petition pending. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the order of the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Paschim Medinipur, he shall be at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. Accordingly, WPA 20250 of 2025 stands disposed of. Urgent certified website copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities. (Kausik Chanda, J.)