[2025:RJ-JP:42317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13841/2025 Deepak Goyal S/o Jagdish Prasad Goyal, R/o Sikrai Bus Stand, Dausa, The Then Junior Assistant, District Empoyment Office, Dholpur (Raj). (Presently Under Suspension At The Headquarters District Employment Office Dausa, (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its The Private Secretary, Department Of Skill, Planning And Enterpreneurship, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Private Secretary Commissioner, Department Of Skill Training And Enterpreneurship, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Director, Employment Service, Directorate, Darbar School Campus, Gopinath Marg, Jaipur. 4. The District Employment Officer, District Employment Office, Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Anil Kumar Shukla For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “1. The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the case and after examining the same be pleased to quash and set aside the order impugned order dated 24.01.2025 (ANNX-2) and the respondent be directed to revoke the order of suspension and reinstate the petitioner on the post of J.A. which he holding prior to the passing of the [2025:RJ-JP:42317] (2 of 3) [CW-13841/2025] order of suspension dated 24.01.2025 (ANNX- 2) with all consequential benefits. 2. Any prejudicial order to the interest of the petitioner, if passed during the pendency of the writ petition, the same may kindly be taken on record and be pleased to quash and set aside. 3. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may consider just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India : (2015) 7 SCC 291. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances in light of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India (supra). 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of judgment as referred herein above by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his [2025:RJ-JP:42317] (3 of 3) [CW-13841/2025] representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/45