Taniparthy Venkata Subba Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLRC/2673/2018 · 2025-07-10
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38623 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38623 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010740552018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2673/2018 Between:
1. TANIPARTHY VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, OCC.RETD. TEACHER, R/O. MANGAMURU VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 2. TANIPARTHY VENKAYAMMA, OCC. HOUSEWIFE,
R/O. MANGAMURU VILLAGE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 3. GANGIREDDY PADMAVATHI, OCC.HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NEAR MSR ROAD, KANIGIRI, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 4. ADIREDDY VENKATA SESHAMMA, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O. REDDYPALEM VILLAGE, PERNAMITTA, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 5. GANGIREDDY PRASADA REDDY, OCC. TEACHER, R/O. MSR ROAD, KANIGIRI, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. 6. ADIREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, OCC. PRIVATE JOB, R/O.
REDDYPALEM, PARNAMITTA, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD, FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. TANIPARTHY CHENCHU LAKSHMI, R/O. MANGAMUR VILLAGE,
S.N.PADU MANDAL, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to Aggrieved by the order of the Learned Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class Excise Court, Ongole, passed in Crl.M.P.No.3747/2018 in CC.No.196/2013, dt.17.9.2018, the appellants beg to prefer the above appeal.
IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C No. 196 of 2013 on the file of Special Judicial Magistrate of I Class Excise Court, Ongole and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders passed in Crl.RC.No.2673/2018 dated 08.10.2018 IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to advance the date of hearing from after vacation to any shorter date and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extent the time for further period in pursuance of the orders of this Honble court passed in Crl.R.C.No.2673/2018 dated 03-12-2021 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous as the main case was ended in acquittal. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 11.07.2025 KAS