Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38621 (AP)

Eedumudu Guru Brahmmam, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Is Principal Secretary

WP/34532/2016 · 2025-08-13

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010743892016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34532/2016 Between: 1. EEDUMUDU GURU BRAHMMAM,, S/O. SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: EX. EMPLOYEE, R/O. H.NO. 5-160/3, INKOLL VILLAGE, POST MATILDA!, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY IS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE & COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COOPERATIVE REGISTRAR OF COOP, SOCIETIES, ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE MANAGING COMMITTEE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL, BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4, in not taking any decision with regard to payment of salary and other allowances to the petitioner on par with the other employees continued in service beyond 58 2 years by virtue of the interim orders of this Hon'ble Court in their favour till a decision has been taken by the 4th respondent-Board dated 26.7.2016, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unconstitutional, being in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, binding prindples of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and consequently direct the responderds 3 and 4, to pay the salary with all consequential benefits on par with the empbyees continued in service by virtue of the interim orders passed by this NMI* Court made in W.P. No. 28263 of 2014, dated 29.6.2016 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 42583 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents 3 and 4, to take an appropriate decision with regard to payment of salaries and other benefits to the petitioner herein on par with the other employees continued in service by virtue of the Interim Orders passed by this Honble Court made in W.P. No. 28263 of 2015, dated 29.6.2016, beyond 58 years, in the ensuing Board meeting and submit a report before this Honble Court, pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA S LANKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI 2. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 3. RAVI KUMAR C The court made the following ORDER:- At the time of considering the matter, Sri Siva S Lanka, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through virtual mode, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the writ petition has become infructuous as no further orders are necessary. 2. Sri C. Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents Bank, is present. 3 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 14.08.2025 GVK 4 194 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.34532 of 2016 Date: 14.08.2025 GVK