S N KAMMAR v. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY
WP/103451/2018 · 2025-07-28
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38620 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38620 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9277 WP No. 103451 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.103451 OF 2018 (S-KSRTC)
BETWEEN:
S. N. KAMMAR, AGE:48 YEARS, OCC: OFFICE ASSISTANT, (ALTERNATIVE JOB) R/O: NWKRTC DEPOT RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H. M. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, NWKRTC, HAVERI DIVISION, HAVERI.
2.
THE DEPOT MANAGER NWKRTC DEPOT, RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI.
3.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF ACCOUNTS, NWKRTC, RANEBENNUR DEPOT, RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUED WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER BEARING NO.
DATED:04.04.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-"A" PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1. ISSUED WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER BEARING NO. DATED:04.04.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-"B" PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND ETC.,
Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9277 WP No. 103451 of 2018
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
A) Issued writ of certiorari by quashing the order bearing No.
dated:04.04.2018 vide Annexure-"A" passed by the respondent no.1.
B) Issued writ of certiorari by quashing the order bearing NO.
dated:04.04.2019 vide Annexure-"B" passed by the respondent no.1.
C) And also grant such any other writ or order which deems fit to this Hon’ble court in the interest of justice and equity.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. Accepting his submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AM/- CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56