^ APHC010740162016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) HjiiH FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8667 OF 2016 ^ Between: P.Ravi Prakash, S/o. Dayanadam, aged about 54 operator, R/o. 3-117-1-3 Balaji Nagar near post office. District Kurnool. years, Occ; Bradma ...PETITIONER AND The A.P. State Seeds Development Corporation Ltd. & Managing Director, registered office at 5-10-193, OPP; Public Gardens, Hyderabad - 500 004 rep by its Vice Chairman HACA Bhavan, II Floor, ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the the High Court may be and issue writ order circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased to call for the records from the respondent herein or direction more particularly the impugned proceedings dated nil-12-2013 in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring one (Served on 03.01.2014) imposing a penalty of stoppage of 2 annual grade increments with effect WEF 01.01.2014 and 01.01.2015 cumulative besides recovery of 27,000/- illegal, unjust, contrary to law and also inviolation of article 14 & 21 of constitution of India consequently. as lA NO: 1 OF 2016rWPMP 10990 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC * in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances stau ► of >he petition, the High Court may be pieased to suspend the impugned proceedings dated nil-12 w 2013 (Served on 03.01.2014) Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI P. SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent: SRI R. MOHAN The Court made the following order: RAO(Not Present) REDDY / APHC010740162016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8667/2016 Between; P. Ravi Prakash ...PETITIONER AND APSDCLVC M D Hyd Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1.R MOHAN REDDY The Court made the followinq'ORDER: ...RESPONDENT There was no representation for the petitioner on 04.07.2025. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for 2. From this, it appears that the dismissal’, none appeared for the petitioner. petitioner is not.interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending 4. applications shall stand closed. Sd/- K.J. RAJA BABU ASSISTANT R^ISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTIoSoFFICER To, ‘7 One CC to Sri P. Sridhar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri R. Mohan Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] ' Two CD Copies. 1. 2. 3. ssb i- r- 't HIGH COURT •• " DATED:18/07/2025 ORDER WP No.8667 OF 2016 2 3 SEP 2025 VsQigent Sectifo^-^^^ |0‘, o r*->‘. y DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS