APHC010743852015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Between: 1. BADE GOWRI NAIDU, VIZIANAGARAM DT.,, S/O SATYAM NAIDU AGED 30 YEARS, BOMMIKA VILLAGE, B. J. PURAM (POST) JIYYAMVALASA MANDALAM, PARVATHIPURAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 1. STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2. BADE RUPAVATHI, W/O GOWRI NAIDU AGED 22 YEARS BOMMIKA VILLAGE, B. J. PURAM (POST) JIYYAMVALASA MANDALAM, PARVATHIPURAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto call fo pertaining to order datede 28 Family Court-cum-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge Vizianagaram in reversing the order dated 5 Addl.J.F.C.M. Parvathipuram and set aside the same. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 1371 OF 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 836 OF 2015 BADE GOWRI NAIDU, VIZIANAGARAM DT.,, S/O SATYAM NAIDU AGED 30 YEARS, BOMMIKA VILLAGE, B. J. PURAM (POST) JIYYAMVALASA MANDALAM, PARVATHIPURAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH BADE RUPAVATHI, W/O GOWRI NAIDU AGED 22 YEARS BOMMIKA VILLAGE, B. J. PURAM (POST) JIYYAMVALASA MANDALAM, THIPURAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto call for the records pertaining to order datede 28-4-2015 in Crl.Rc.no. 1 of 2015 on the file of III Addl. District and Sessions Judge Vizianagaram in reversing the order dated 5-11-2014 in M.C.no. 7 of 2012 on the file of the thipuram and set aside the same. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 1371 OF 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO BADE GOWRI NAIDU, VIZIANAGARAM DT.,, S/O SATYAM NAIDU AGED 30 YEARS, BOMMIKA VILLAGE, B. J. PURAM (POST) JIYYAMVALASA MANDALAM, PARVATHIPURAM DIVISION, ...PETITIONER STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF BADE RUPAVATHI, W/O GOWRI NAIDU AGED 22 YEARS BOMMIKA VILLAGE, B. J. PURAM (POST) JIYYAMVALASA MANDALAM, ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the r the records 2015 in Crl.Rc.no. 1 of 2015 on the file of III Addl. District and Sessions Judge Vizianagaram in 2014 in M.C.no. 7 of 2012 on the file of the Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings order dated 28-04-2015 in Crl. R. C. No. 1 / 2015 on the file of Family Court-cum-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge Vizianagaram pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. G U R C PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 05.11.2014 passed by the learned Judge, Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Parvathipuram in M.C.No.7 of 2012. 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 4. Heard. Perused the entire material on record. 5. A perusal of the report received from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Vizianagaram, goes to show that notices were issued to the petitioner as well as respondent to appear before the said authority. Petitioner appeared before the said authority on 28.5.2025 and his statement was recorded wherein it is stated that the matter has been settled in the year 2017 and at present there is no maintenance dispute pending between them. Subsequent to the settlement of maintenance dispute, he remarried one lady in the year 2019 and they were blessed with a female child. It is further stated that respondent also remarried subsequent to the settlement of matrimonial dispute. 6. Considering the report and enclosed statement of the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as the cause does not survive. 7. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 24.7.2025 TJN 263 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 836 OF 2015 Dated: 24.7.2025 TJN