APHC010741412011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13381/2011 Between: 1. V.SREENIVASULU, S/O JANAKIRAMAIAH EX.MANAGER, R/O 6/980, SHANKARAPURAM KADAPA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE INDIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY AP BRANCH, 3-6-212, STREET NO.15, HIMAYATNAGAR, HYDERABAD. REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE SECRETARY. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM DISTRICT PRESIDENT, INDIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY, KADAPA Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE HONOURARY SECREARYCUMDISTRICT MEDICAL HEALTH OFFICER, KADAPA, INDIAN RED CROSS SOCIETY, KADAPA. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the order of removal passed by the 2nd respondent in his Rc.No.Blook Bank/IRC-KDP/2007, dt. 2-6-2008 removing the petitioner from the post of manager, Indian Red Cross society, Kadapa, as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, highhanded unilateral, without notice, without enquiry and without application of mind and against the statutory provisions and consequently set aside the order or removal passed by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.Blook Bank/IRCS-KDP/2007, dt. 2-6-2008 by reinstating the petitioner with continuity of service and attendant benefits. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 16233 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court 2 may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the WP pending disposal of the above WP. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V.SREENIVASULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CH PUSHYAM KIRAN 2. GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE 3. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 13381 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:13381 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP