[2025:RJ-JP:45832] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14133/2025 Krishan Pal Singh S/o Durjan Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Plot No. 278, Chandawato Ki Pol, Talanpur, Nagaur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Regional Manager, Punjab National Bank, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Branch Kukus, Near Annapurna Hotel District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Cyber Cell, Mumbai Police, Through Nodal Officer, Police Station 90 Feet Road, Dharavi, Mumbai-17 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harsh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shubham Sharma for Mr. Saumtira Chaturvedi, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 14/11/2025 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(i) The respondents may be directed to complete the investigation from the petitioner (if any) and allow the petitioner to operate his bank account on provisional basis without any interruption. (ii) The respondent No.2 bank may be directed to de-freeze the saving bank account No.7876000100051788, IFSC CODE: PUNB0787600, Customer name: Krishanpal Singh in the respondent Punjab national bank at Kukus, near Annapurna Hotel Jaipur Rajasthan and allow the petitioner to operate his account and use his own amount deposited in the bank. (iii) Any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be passed in favor of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not misused his bank account for the purpose of illegal transaction and has not committed any Cyber Crime. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the Investigating Agency. He, therefore, prays that the disputed amount which has been received in the petitioner’s [2025:RJ-JP:45832] (2 of 2) [CW-14133/2025] Bank Account No. 7876000100051788 may be freezed but the amount, other than the disputed amount, may be permitted to be withdrawn by the petitioner as on account of freezing of the bank account of the petitioner, he is facing problems in day to day money transactions. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent(s) has not opposed the arguments made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the submissions made before this Court, it is directed to the respondent - Bank to de-freeze the Savings Bank Account No. 7876000100051788 of the petitioner in Punjab National Bank. However, the disputed amount which has been alleged to have been credited in the petitioner’s bank account in connection with fraudulent transaction shall remain freezed in the account of the petitioner and he will be allowed to operate his account aforementioned savings bank account for day to day money transactions. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner will cooperate with the Investigating Officer and he will appear before Investigating Agency as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue his above mentioned bank account with the respondent - Bank till the investigation is completed by the Investigating Agency. It is also made clear that in case, after the investigation, the involvement of the petitioner is found in any illegal transaction, the Investigating Agency would be free to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J SAHIL SONI /210