Majjari Venkatesu v. The APGENCO rep. by its Managing Director,
WP/29443/2012 · 2025-01-29
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38605 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38605 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010737502012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No:29443 OF 2012 Between: Majjari Venkatesu
…Petitioner AND The APGENCO rep. by its Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad and two others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.V.Shivaji Counsel for the Respondents: Sri M.Vidyasagar
Ld. Standing Counsel for
APGENCO
Ms. K.Aruna The Court made the following order:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and no further orders are required in this writ petition.
2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
3. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH. N BV