IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.2006 of 2020 a/w CWPOA Nos.2005 & 2048 of 2020 Decided on: 28.11.2025. _________________________________________________________ 1. CWPOA No.2006 of 2020 Kavinder Singh & Others ...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Others ...Respondents 2. CWPOA No.2005 of 2020 Bishan Dass & Others ...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Others ...Respondents 3. CWPOA No.2048 of 2020 Munshi Ram ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioners: Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate, for the petitioners, in all the petitions. For the respondents: Mr. Navlesh Vema, Additional Advocate General, for respective respondents-State, in all the petitions. Ms. Kiran Dhiman, Advocate, 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - for respective respondents, in all the petitions. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Learned Counsel for petitioners in all the petitions, on Instructions states that the petitioners do not intend to pursue the present proceedings and the same may be closed, reserving liberty for the petitioners, to ventilate their surviving grievances, in subsequent proceedings, if so advised. [Statement taken on record]. 2. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by the opposite parties. In view of the above, the instant petitions are closed with aforesaid liberty. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge November 28, 2025 [Shivender]