HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 174 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within two months from today. October 6, 2025 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Pratap Singh, Vivek Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Sanjay Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad