1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.5011 OF 2008 (INJ) BETWEEN: SHRI RAMA LAXMAN GAVADE SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs. 1(a). SMT.LAXMI RAMA GAVADE, AGE:70 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (b). SMT.PARVATI ISWAR GAVADE, AGE:52 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (c). SRI.VIJAY ISWAR GAVADE, AGE:23 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (d). SRI.TRIMURTHY ISWAR GAVADE, AGE:20 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (e). SRI.LAXMAN ISWAR GAVADE, AGE:18 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (f). SRI.ASHOK RAMA GAVADE, AGE:50 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (g). SMT.SUSHEELA DEVU GAONKAR, AGE:45 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (h). SRI.SHANKAR RAMA GAVADE, AGE:39 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (i). SRI.CHIDAMBAR RAMA GAVADE, AGE:35 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. 2 (j). SMT.CHANDRAKALA KOM VISHNU GAONKAR, AGE:33 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (k). SMT.PRAMILA CHANDRAKANT GAVAS, AGE:31 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (l). SMT.MARUTI RAMA GAVADE, AGE:29 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. (m). SMT.SUVARNA BALAKRISHNA SAWANT, AGE:27 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE. ALL R/O KARAMBAI VILLAGE, POST:ANMOD, TQ:JOIDA, DIST:UTTAR KANNADA. ...APPELLANTS [BY SRI.PRAKASH B.ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR A1(a to m)(ABSENT)] AND: 1. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, HALIYAL DIVISION, HALIYAL, TQ.HALIYAL, DIST:UTTAR KANNAD. 2. THE ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ALNAVAR SUB-DIVISION, GANESHGUDI, POST:GANESHGUDI, TQ:JOIDA. 3. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER, TINEGHAT, TQ:JOIDA. 4. THE SECTION FORESTER, KARAMBAL, POST:ANMOD, TQ:JOIDA. 5. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UTTAR KANNAD, KARWAR. … RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R5 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) 3 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.05.2008 PASSED BY THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.), YALLAPUR IN R.A.NO.34/2007 AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.03.2007 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), DANDELI IN O.S.NO.51/2004. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. A Warning List was web-hosted on 15.10.2022 followed by Until Disposal List. The Until Disposal List was web-hosted on 29.10.2022 fixing the date of hearing from 02.11.2022. The captioned appeal is listed in until disposal list commencing from 02.11.2022. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2008. Now we are in the month of November 2022. The appeal is pending for almost fourtheen years. 4 The matter was called out from 02.11.2022. There was no representation on behalf of appellants. As already noted above, though the matter called twice today also, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. Despite giving several opportunities, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE TKN