CHAUDHARY VINOD SINGH PHAUGAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMS/1698/2025 · 2026-04-29
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 386 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 386 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS No.1698 of 2025 Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, learned Counsel i/b Mr. Vijay Bhatt, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
3. Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner made a statement at bar that due to subsequent developments in the matter, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
4. In view of aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
29.04.2026 R.Dang