[2025:RJ-JP:43948] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16657/2025 Sandeep Kumar S/o Dilip Kumar, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Near Ganesh Mandir, Shahbad District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Baran. 4. Gvk Emergency Management And Research Institute, 108 Ambulance, 1St Floor, Sihfw Building, South Of Doordarshan Kendra, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India Through Its Hr Head. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakahar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 01/11/2025 1. Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice for respondent(s). 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers: “I) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Driver in the 108 Emergency Services and not to replace him by another set up of contractual employees; [2025:RJ-JP:43948] (2 of 3) [CW-16657/2025] ii) By further appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby further direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Driver after extending the benefit under the Rajasthan Contractual Hiring to Civil Posts Rules, 2022. iii) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper on the facts and in the circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of petitioner with cost of petition.” 3. Considered submissions of learned counsel for petitioner who referred and relied upon judgment dated 17.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12679/2020 Rakesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. based on judgment in case of Rodu Lal & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11737/2024 decided on 26.08.2025 by the Division Bench at Jodhpur and submits that the controversy as raised in the instant writ petition is decided by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and the matter be disposed of in accordance with judgment as referred by him. 4. Learned counsel for respondent(s) has no objection in case the representation is filed on behalf of ratio as laid down by Hon’ble Division Bench. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the [2025:RJ-JP:43948] (3 of 3) [CW-16657/2025] respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /57