Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38593 (PNJ)

MANISHA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/2952/2025 · 2025-03-25

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 114 Manisha and another State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents No.4 to 9 and their relatives. 2. are major and have married against the wishes of respondents no.4 to apprehend danger from respondents no.4 to well as photographs evidencing thei and Annexure P 22.03.2025 (Annexure P 3. 4. the State. 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a 2952-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Decided on:25.03.2025 and another Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents and their relatives. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondents no.4 to apprehend danger from respondents no.4 to well as photographs evidencing their marriage are on record as Annexures P and Annexure P-4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated .03.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punj Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2952-2025 Decided on:25.03.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondents no.4 to 9. They apprehend danger from respondents no.4 to 9. Their marriage certificate as r marriage are on record as Annexures P 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 5) to respondent no.2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 & 3 for protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and not to interfere in their peaceful life at the behest of respondents Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners . They . Their marriage certificate as r marriage are on record as Annexures P-3 4. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated ab, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary VINOD KUMAR value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a 2025.03.26 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-29 direction to respondent no.2 Nagar, Punjab, and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. March 25, 2025 vinod* 2952-2025 direction to respondent no.2- Superintendent of Police, Nagar, Punjab, to decide the representation (Annexure P and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to titioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. March 25, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Superintendent of Police, Banga, District SBS to decide the representation (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to titioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES SBS 5) of the petitioners It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to titioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion VINOD KUMAR 2025.03.26 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document