GUNJAN GARG W/O SHRI YOGESH GARG D/O RAM DAYAL GOYAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2953/2025 · 2025-05-30
Sameer Jain
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38591 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38591 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22856] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2953/2025
1. Gunjan Garg W/o Shri Yogesh Garg D/o Ram Dayal Goyal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o F-150, Mohan Nagar, Hindaun City, P.S. New Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli, At Present Residing At Plot No. 23, Surendra Pal Colony, Shyam Nagar, P.S. Shyam Nagar, Jaipur.
2. Gautam Goyal S/o Shri Ram Dayal Goyal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Goyal Floor Mill, Sajan Market, Sri Mahaveerji, P.S. Sri Maharveerji, District Karauli, At Present Residing At Plot No. 23, Surendra Pal Colony, Shyam Nagar, P.S. Shyam Nagar, Jaipur. ----Accused-Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. ---Respondnet
2. Yogesh Kumar Garg S/o Lage Shri Bhairo Lal Garg, Aged About 44 Years, R/o F-150, Mohan Nagar, Hindaun City, P.s. New Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli. ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satyapal Poshwal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.GA with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. Mr. Sanjay Singh, ASI, P.S. Nai Mandi, Hindaun City Mr. Sunil Tyagi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 30/05/2025 The instant matter pertains to a matrimonial dispute. It is brought to the knowledge of this Court upon an interaction with the minor children that they are living happily with the husband; that husband has submitted in the Court that the petitioner is living in adultery.
[2025:RJ-JP:22856] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2953/2025] Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the investigation officer and parties present-in-person, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the present petition. Further, investigating officer is at liberty to carry out the investigation and submit the outcome of the investigation before the concerned Court. Howsoever, considering the facts, this Courts directs that till conclusion of the investigation, no coercive action be taken qua the petitioner subject to joining the investigation. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/499