Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3859 (AP)

Amrutha Nagaraju v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/1579/2020 · 2025-02-21

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010023322020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Amrutha Nagaraju The State Of AP and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 1579/2020 ...Petitioner AND The State Of AP and Others ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for the Respondents: Addl. Advocate General (AP) Narasimha Rao Gudiseva following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...Petitioner ...Respondents Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Addl. Advocate General (AP) Narasimha Rao Gudiseva submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Writ Petition is dismissed as As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand ______________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA BSK 35 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 1579/2020 Date: 21.02.2025 BSK