2025:HHC:45043 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.1132 of 2019 Decided on : 22.12.2025 __________________________________________________________ Ved Prakash and another .....Petitioners Versus State of HP and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for Respondents No.1 and 2-State. Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for Respondents No.3 and 4. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on Instructions, states that due to subsequent events, Petitioners do not intend to continue with the present proceedings [Statement Taken on Record]. 2. Based on the statement made by Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, which is not opposed by Learned State Counsel and Learned Counsel for Private Respondents also, instant proceedings are closed. In aforesaid terms, instant petition stands 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:45043 disposed of alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge December 22, 2025 [Bhardwaj]