APHC010736552013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 29927/2013 Between: 1. M/S ESPIONAGE TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, V. VENUGOPAL, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O F.NO. 24, BLOCK III, ROCK ROOF APARTMENTS, ROAD NO. 12, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD, 500 034 ...PETITIONER AND 1. TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM REPRESENTED BY ITS, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. CHIEF VIGILANCE SECURITY OFFICER, TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction particularlyone in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, daclaring the action of the Respondents in not paying the rental money for the serikes utilised by the Devasthanam in hiring CC cameras installed at Vishnu Nivasam,TTD, Tirupati on temporary basisduring 01-07-2012 to 10-01-2013 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and against the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to release the rental money IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37157 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd Respondent to pay immediately the due rental money pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V RAMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P HARINATH GUPTA The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 02.07.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 04.07.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 29927 of 2013 Date: 04.07.2025 IKN