[2025:RJ-JP:41546] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12604/2025 1. Subir @ Sunil @ Subil S/o Shri Hetram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Shiv Nagar Kachchi Basti, Naya Housing Board, Madanganj, P.s. Madanganj, District Ajmer (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) 2. Karan @ Karan S/o Matoli Sindhiwal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Shiv Nagar Kachchi Basti, Naya Housing Board, Madanganj, P.S. Madanganj, District Ajmer (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-Addl.G.A-cum-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioners in connection with the FIR No. 151/2025 registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer wherein they were charged for the offences punishable under Sections 331 (4) and 305 (a) of BNS. 2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is at par with the case of co-accused persons Kunnal Sharma and Pratap Kumar who have already been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.09.2025. Counsel submits that similar indulgence may be granted to the petitioners as well. Counsel further submits [2025:RJ-JP:41546] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12604/2025] that the petitioners are in custody since the date of their arrest and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that indulgence of bail has already been granted to the co-accused persons namely Kunnal Sharma and Pratap Kumar and also considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody since the date of their arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Subir @ Sunil @ Subil S/o Shri Hetram and Karan @ Karan S/o Matoli Sindhiwal arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/101