APHC010733132013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11631/2013 Between: 1. K.DHANANJAYA NAIDU,, SLO LATE K.MUNI RATNAM NAIDU, AGED 37 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, RIO PACHANNA PALLE POST, R.KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. HYDERABAD 2. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly a one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in laying the electricity lines and poles in the scheudle property agriculture land bearing Sy.No. 192/4, 192/5, 192/6B, 193/2, 193/3, 193/4, 193/5, 193/A, 193/1B of an extent of Ac. 3.00, 3.64, 1.00, 1.77, 0.59, 0.58, 0.76, 1.25 and 1.82 respectively situated at Arathala Revenue village accounts, Arathala Panchayath, Chittoor District is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional being violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and also in violation of Principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents not to lay electricity lines and poles in the above schedule property and not to demolish the compound wall and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 14404 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the schedule property of an extent of 555.55 sq. yards situated in Sy.No. 23 at Varadaraja Nagar Residential Area 6th Ward Tirupati Town, Chittoor District belongs to the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 24.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 26.06.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11631 of 2013 Date: 26.06.2025 IKN