132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16708-2025 Date of Decision: 01.04.2025 Puneet Dhiman and others …Petitioners vs. State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Mahesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rubal Pawar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS with a prayer to direct the respondents not to indulge in further enquiry in any of the complaint moved by respondent No.9. 2. On advance notice, Mr. Rubal Pawar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab has appeared on behalf of the official respondents and submits that a complaint was received by Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala from respondent No.9. However, after holding preliminary inquiry, inquiries have been closed and no matter is pending with the police authorities in this regard. 3. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition, at this stage. 4. Dismissed as not pressed, at this stage. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 01.04.2025 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.04.02 23:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document