Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38559 (KAR)

NINGAMMA D/O NINGAPPA KURUBARU v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/106329/2025 · 2025-09-02

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11147 WP No. 106329 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 106329 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: NINGAMMA D/O. NINGAPPA KURUBARU, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWORK, R/O: AT JEERALKLGUDI, POST: JEERAL, TQ: KANAKAGIRI, DIST: KOPPAL – 583 283. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.N. GULARADDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PRESIDENT OF ANGANAWADI WORKER/HELPER, SELECTION COMMITTEE, KOPPAL- 583 231. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE AND SELECTION COMMITTEE, KOPPAL - 583 231. 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, KANAKAGIRI, TQ: KANAKAGIRI, DIST: KOPPAL- 581 196. 4. AMBIKA U D/O. NARASAPPA, AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWORK, R/O: AT HOSA JEERALKLGUDI, POST: JEERAL, TQ: KANAKAGIRI, DIST: KOPPAL- 583 283. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.N.HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Date: 2025.09.04 11:39:12 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11147 WP No. 106329 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONAL LIST DATED 18.08.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-F TO ISSUE BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO.3 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. ISSUE THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE PROVISIONAL LIST VIDE ANNEXURE- H DATED 21-8-2025 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO 3 IN RESPECT OF SERIAL NO 106 OF THE PROVISIONAL LIST IN HOSA JEERALKALGUDI-3 ANGANAWADI CENTRE IN KANAKAGIRI TALUK KOPPAL DISTRICT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the provisional list dated 18.08.2025 vide Annexure-F issued by respondent Nos.1 to 3 and also sought for a writ of mandamus directing respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the objections submitted by the petitioner to the provisional list vide Annexure-H dated 21.08.2025 before respondent No.3, in respect of Sl.No.106 of the provisional list in Hosa Jirala Kalgudi-3 Anganawadi Center in Kanakagiri Taluk, Koppal District. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11147 WP No. 106329 of 2025 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner restricts her prayer only regarding writ of mandamus directing respondent No.3 to consider the objections filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-H insofar as Sl.No.106 of the provisional list. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondents. 4. The respondents have invited applications for the post of Anganawadi Helper. The petitioner and other candidates have submitted their applications and respondent Nos.1 to 3 have scrutinized the applications submitted by the candidates. The petitioner has submitted an objection to the application submitted by respondent No.4 contending that the petitioner has scored more marks than respondent No.4 and respondent Nos.1 to 3 have shown the name of respondent No.4 in the provisional list and respondents Nos.1 to 3 have not considered the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11147 WP No. 106329 of 2025 objections submitted by the petitioner and no order is passed on the objections submitted by the petitioner. 5. Learned High Court Government Pleader submit that if a reasonable time is granted to respondent No.3, respondent No.3 would consider the objections filed by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order. 6. In view of the submission made by the learned High Court Government Pleader, the petition is allowed. 7. Respondent No.3 is directed to consider the objection submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-H within one week from today and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. 8. All the contentions of the parties are kept open. SD/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE SH/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43