Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38558 (KAR)

ANILKUMAR MRUTYUNJAY ADI v. K.S.R.T.C.

WP/106499/2016 · 2025-12-01

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16853 WP No. 106499 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 106499 OF 2016 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: ANILKUMAR MRUTYUNJAY ADI, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O: 4TH CROSS, KALYAN NAGAR, DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. G. BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. K.S.R.T.C. R-BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.H. ROAD, SHANTI NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 027. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, N W K R T C, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI – 580 014. 3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, N W K R T C, DHARWAD DIVISION, DHARWAD-580 008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO WRIT OF MANDAMUS MAY BE ISSUED BY DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURES-A TO A1 AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16853 WP No. 106499 of 2016 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: A. Writ of mandamus may be issued by directing the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to consider the representations of the petitioner vide Annexures-A to A1, in the ends of justice. B. Any other writ or Order or Directions may kindly be issued in favour of the Petitioner by this Hon’ble Court, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. Heard Sri.V.G.Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Prashant S. Hosamani, learned counsel for respondent. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent- Corporation places a document on record indicating that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by granting an appointment on compassionate grounds. 4. In that light, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE AC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 105