1 2025:CGHC:39020 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9114 of 2025 1 - Uttam Kumar Nayak S/o Shri Manrakhan Nayak, Aged About 32 Years Working As Lecturer (Mechnical) At Govt. Polytechnic, Balod, District Balod (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Skill Development, Technical Education, Employment And Training, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - The Additional Director, Technical Education, Directorate Building, Block-03, Third Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - The Principal, Polytechnic, Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. A. G. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 06/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming the following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 26.06.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the respondent No. 2.” ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.08.08 20:03:21 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that vide order dated 15.06.2023, the petitioner who is Lecturer (Mechanical) was posted at Govt, Polytechnic College, Bhatapara, Dist- Balodabazar Bhatapara has been attached to Govt. Polytechnic College, Balod, Dist- Balod and presently vide order dated 26.06.2025 his attachment was cancelled and he has been sent back to his original place of posting i.e. Govt. Polytechnic College, Bhatapara. He would further submit that the petitioner is differently abled employee and having 40% locomotive disability, therefore, he may be permitted to remain there at Balod. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondent/ State opposes and has submitted that as per the transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, all the attachments are deemed to be cancelled with effect from 05.06.2025 and in pursuance thereof the attachment of the petitioner is also cancelled and he has been sent back to his original place of posting. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material annexed with the petition. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, further considering that vide transfer policy dated 05.06.2025, all the attachments has been cancelled with effect from 05.06.2025 as provided under Clause 3.17 "सभी सलग्नीकरण 5 जू नी, 2025 स समाप्त मानी जूएंगे। भीविष्य मा विभीगेध्यक्ष /भीरसधक सचि क अनी!मा"दनी स ही क"ई सलग्नीकरण कर सक गे।" 6. Therefore, the present petition is disposed of directing the petitioner that his representation before the authorities concerned and if such representation is being made, the authorities concerned shall take a 3 decision on his representation in accordance with law on its own merits as early as possible. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok