The Chairman Cum Managing Director v. K. Dharmalingam
WA/1656/2025 · 2025-06-16
K Surender, R Subramanian
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38543 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38543 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.A.No.1656 of 2025 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.06.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER W.A.No.1656 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.9988 of 2025 1.The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Additional Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Erode Electricity Distribution Circle, Erode. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Erode Electricity Distribution Circle, Erode. 4.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ingoor Perunthurai Division, Erode District. ...Appellants Vs. K.Dharmalingam
...Respondent 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1656 of 2025 Prayer
: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the order dated 16.10.2023 made in W.P.No.18731 of 2021. For Appellants : Mr.K.Rajkumar For Respondent : Mr.Dhalapathy Vignesh Kumar ****** J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) Challenge is to the order of the writ Court dated 06.10.2023 made in W.P.No.18731 of 2021.
2. The claim of the respondent for compassionate appointment was rejected by the Electricity Board mainly on the ground that the application was barred by time. On an earlier occasion, the respondent filed W.P.No.31399 of 2014 as against the order of rejection. This Court vide
order dated 05.01.2021 found that the application was in time and directed the respondent to pass orders afresh. The second rejection order which was impugned in the Writ Petition was on the same ground. We therefore see no 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1656 of 2025 merit in the appeal and the order impugned in this Writ Appeal does not call for interference.
3. Hence, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
4. Mr.K.Rajkumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants has also produced the order of the Chief Engineer/ Personnel offering compassionate appointment to the respondent. The same is also recorded. Since we have dismissed the appeal on the ground that the earlier order has become final, this order will not serve as a precedent.
(R.S.M.,J.) (K.S.,J.) dsa 16.06.2025 Index : No Neutral Citation : Yes Speaking order 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1656 of 2025 To 1.The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2.The Additional Chief Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Erode Electricity Distribution Circle, Erode. 3.The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Erode Electricity Distribution Circle, Erode. 4.The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ingoor Perunthurai Division, Erode District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1656 of 2025 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER,
J.
dsa W.A.No.1656 of 2025 16.06.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis