Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38542 (CHH)

DINESH KUMAR JAIN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/946/2021 · 2025-06-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24590 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 946 of 2021 1 - Dinesh Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Kailash Chand Jain Aged About 39 Years R/o Kunkuri, Police Station Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 2 - Shailesh Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Kailash Chand Jain Aged About 41 Years R/o Kunkuri, Police Station Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 3 - Sandeep Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Kailash Chand Jain Aged About 45 Years R/o Kunkuri, Police Station Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 4 - Rajesh Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Kailash Chand Jain Aged About 47 Years R/o Kunkuri, Police Station Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 5 - Sanjay Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Kailash Chand Jain Aged About 49 Years R/o Kunkuri, Police Station Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN 2 2 - Radheshyam Prabhakar S/o Late Nagwan Prabhakar Caste Khairwar, R/o Village Bataikela, Police Station Sitapur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh Presently Residing At Bazar Dand, Police Station Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 16/06/2025 1. None appears on behalf of the applicants to press this revision petition on repeated calls, when the matter is called out. 2. Mr. Amit Verma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the respondent/ State is present. 3. The present criminal revision has been filed by the applicants with following prayer: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to allow the Criminal Revision and set aside the order where charges framed by the Special Judge (SC/ST) Prevention of Atrocities Act 1989 Authorized under Section 14 of the said Act Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) in Special Case No.36/2021, in the interest of justice.” 4. In view of the communication made by the trial Court concerned regarding disposal of Special Case No.36/2021, it seems that the criminal case has been disposed of and as such, the matter has 3 become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, instant criminal revision is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Akhil