Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11563 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Kaushilya Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deena Nath,Deepak Kumar,Himanshu Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Arindam Sinha,J. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J. Mr. Deena Nath Joshi, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, respondent no. 7 with blessing of respondent no.5 is causing disturbance with his client's peaceful possession of her property. He seeks issuance of mandamus upon State to protect his client. Mr. Devesh Vikram, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State and submits, it is a civil dispute. He disputes submission against respondent no.5. The writ petition does not disclose any complaint lodged with the police, let alone F.I.R. registered. In the circumstances, petitioner must approach the civil Court for obtaining restraint against respondent no. 7. Since we are disposing of the writ petition at this stage, we do not deem it necessary to direct issuance of notice on said respondent. The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.4.2025 NSC (Arindam Sinha, J.) (Avnish Saxena, J.) Digitally signed by :- NARENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad