[2025:RJ-JP:23300] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 829/2025 Chiranjilal S/o Dhannalal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Janta Basti Niwai, Police Station Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avinash Dhanju for Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Laddha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 17/06/2025 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 482 B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.67/2019 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi for offence under Sections 420, 406, 384, 506, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Heard and considered. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the call details collected by the Investigating Agency does not show any connection of the accused petitioner with the other accused. He also submits that no purpose will be served by sending the accused-petitioner in custody as no recovery has to be made from the accused-petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:23300] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-829/2025] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that as per investigation report, the accused-petitioner along with other co-accused have collected more than two crores of rupees from the unemployed youth for getting them the Government employment. He further submits that the accused-petitioner required custodial interrogation as the allegations against the accused-petitioner are of serious nature. 5. Having considered the allegations against the petitioner and gravity of the offences, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J GAURAV/261