2025:HHC:40683 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 179 of 2025 Date of decision: 28.11.2025. Harfee Ram deceased through LRs. ...Petitioners. Versus Collector Land Acquisition & others ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Navee Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the respondents : Ms. Seema Sharma, DAG. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (oral): Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Heard. 3. The issue involved in this petition has already been decided by this Court vide judgment dated 16.9.2025 in a batch of matters with Civil Revision No. 75 of 2025, titled as Deharu vs. Collector Land Acquisition SDO Civil Kullu & others, as lead case. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 4. Since there is no distinction of facts between this revision petition and those decided vide the aforesaid judgment, this petition is also disposed of in terms of the judgment ibid. The reasons assigned in the said judgment in Deharu (supra) shall mutatis-mutandis apply to this petition also. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. The impugned orders are set aside with directions to learned Executing Court to decide the question as to the fate of taking over the possession afresh, by affording the parties reasonable opportunities of being heard, strictly in accordance with law. Needless to say that the parties shall be at liberty to produce their respective evidence on the aforesaid question, if so advised. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 28th November, 2025 Judge (kck)