IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18994 of 2025 Decided on: 03.12.2025. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Addl. Advocate General, Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pleadings in the writ petition are not proper. That the order passed by the respondents withholding the arrears of pension for three years prior to the date of filing of writ petition Dr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma versus State of H.P and others2 was required to be assailed with appropriate grounds. This has been inadvertently left out. Learned counsel, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2CWP No. 6100/2023, decided on 5.09.2023 2 the writ petition with liberty to file afresh with appropriate pleadings supported with documents. 2. Granting such liberty, writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 03, 2025 Judge yogesh