Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38536 (PNJ)

JASMAT AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

CRM-M/16984/2025 · 2025-05-22

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-16984-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CRM-M-16984-2025(O&M) Decided on:22.05.2025 Jasmat and others …...Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and another …...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Parvinder Moar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana. **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. CRM-14740-2025 i) Present application has been filed under Section 528 of BNSs, seeking preponement of the date of hearing of the main case. ii) Since, main case is listed for hearing today itself, the present application has been rendered infructuous. iii) Accordingly, application is disposed of as having become infructuous. CRM-M-16984-2025(O&M) i) Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0071 dated 06.04.2023, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 341 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Uchana, District Jind as well as consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 19.03.2025(P-2). ii) On 15.05.2025, following order was passed by this Court: “1. On the very outset, it is pointed out by counsel for the petitioners that there are total 09 accused, and 04 of them, namely; RASHMI 2025.05.23 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-16984-2025(O&M) 2 Sushil, Rani, Palli and Ravi, were found innocent. Thus, remaining 05 accused have filed present compromising quashing petition. 2. On the other hand, learned State counsel points out that apart the complainant - Respondent No.2 - Gurmeet, there are four other victims also, i.e., Roshni, Dalbir, Sunita and Ram Phal, who have not been impleaded in the array of respondents. 3. List again on 22.05.2025. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the petitioners shall file the amended memo of parties in the registry, by impleading all the necessary and concerned parties. To be show in the urgent list.” iii) Today, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. iv) In view of the above, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. v) Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE May 22, 2025 rashmi Whether Speaking/Reasoned:YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RASHMI 2025.05.23 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document