Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38534 (RAJ)

RAJASTHALI PVT I T I AND ORS v. STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ORS

CW/15002/2016 · 2025-07-11

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15002/2016 1. Rajasthali Pvt. ITI, Sikandara, Dausa Through Society Bharti Vidhya Mandir Samiti Through Secretary, 225, Shanti Nagar, Durgapura, Jaipur 2. Divini Fire Safety Pvt. ITI, Bonli, Sawai Madhopur Raj. Through Society Udyimaan Jan Kalyan Sansth, 15, Rajiv Vihar, Mansarover, Jaipur Raj. 3. Pushpavati Pvt. ITI, Bandikuie, Dausa Raj. Through Society J.p. Charitable And Educational Trust Th, 15, Rajiv Vihar, Mansarover, Jaipur Raj. 4. Neelkanth Pvt. ITI, Madalgarh, Bhilwara Raj. Through Society Abhudaya Jan Kalyan Sansthan, Jaipur, 15, Rajiv Vihar, Mansarover, Jaipur Raj. 5. Unique Pvt. ITI, Bhadra Hanumangarh Raj. Through Society Bharat Sainik Public School Sansthan Bhad, Ward No. 22, Bhadra, Hanumangarh Raj. 6. Shriram Pvt ITI, Dheerwals Bade, Tehsil Tara Nagar, District Churu Through Society Sh. Balaji Scho, Vpo Chukiyagarh, Post Khigarla, Tehsil, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Technical Education, State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Director, Technical Education Department, Rajasthan, W-6, Residency Road, Jodhpur-342001 3. Director General Of Employment And Training Dget, Ministry Of Labour And Employment, Govt. Of India, Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Digvijay Singh for Mr. Ashish Kumar Mr. Ajay Verma for Mr. Avanish Kumar Sharma, Dy.GC (2 of 2) [CW-15002/2016] JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/07/2025 1. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners. Even on last occasions, when the matter was listed before this Court i.e. on 24.05.2024 and 21.03.2023, no one was appeared appearance on behalf of the petitioner. This petition is lying pending before this Court since 2016. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in arguing this matter. 2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/86