Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-17027-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.04.2025 GURMEET AND OTHERS …Petitioners V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
…Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Parvinder Mor, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavata, AAG Haryana. Mr. Gagandeep Sanwal, Advocate for respondent No. 2. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)
1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.0072 dated 06.04.2023 under Sections 147/149/323/354/379(A) of IPC registered at Police Station Uchana, District Jind (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. The following order was passed on 27.03.2025:
“This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR
No.0072
dated
06.04.2023
under
Sections 147/149/323/354/379(A) of IPC registered at Police Station Uchana, District Jind (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion for 28.04.2025. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Vikas Singh Chawra, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his power of attorney and admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.04.29 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-17027-2025 (O&M) -2- In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.”
3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4.
In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466 and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition is allowed and FIR No.0072 dated 06.04.2023 under Sections 147/149/323/354/379(A) of IPC registered at Police Station Uchana, District Jind (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed, qua the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) 28.04.2025
JUDGE
Ajay Goswami Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AJAY GOSWAMI 2025.04.29 18:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document